第130章（2 / 2）
[138]Cf.Grumel，‘Chronologie’5 ff.
[139]Nov.90（Zepos，Jus Ⅰ，156 f.）。
[140]Grumel，‘Chronologie’8 ff.
[141]Cf.Dvornik，Photian Schism 275 ff.
[142]P.Grierson and R.J.H.Jenkins，‘The Date of Constantine Ⅶ’s Coronation’，B 32（1962），133 ff.，show that Constantine Porphyrogenitus was probably crowned on 15 May 908（and not on 9 June 911 as previously supposed）。
[143]To express his satisfaction at finally becoming senior Emperor after being co-Emperor for thirty-three years Alexander even styled himself in his coins as;cf.Musmov，B 6（1931），99 f.Both this informative legend on the coinage-the oldest known use of the title‘autocrator’on coins-and all the literary evidence serve to refute Spulber，Les Novelles de Léon le Sage（1934），47，note 1，who maintains that Alexander was never senior Emperor but only ruled in the name of Constantine Ⅶ。 ↑返回顶部↑
[139]Nov.90（Zepos，Jus Ⅰ，156 f.）。
[140]Grumel，‘Chronologie’8 ff.
[141]Cf.Dvornik，Photian Schism 275 ff.
[142]P.Grierson and R.J.H.Jenkins，‘The Date of Constantine Ⅶ’s Coronation’，B 32（1962），133 ff.，show that Constantine Porphyrogenitus was probably crowned on 15 May 908（and not on 9 June 911 as previously supposed）。
[143]To express his satisfaction at finally becoming senior Emperor after being co-Emperor for thirty-three years Alexander even styled himself in his coins as;cf.Musmov，B 6（1931），99 f.Both this informative legend on the coinage-the oldest known use of the title‘autocrator’on coins-and all the literary evidence serve to refute Spulber，Les Novelles de Léon le Sage（1934），47，note 1，who maintains that Alexander was never senior Emperor but only ruled in the name of Constantine Ⅶ。 ↑返回顶部↑