第148章（2 / 2）
[26]Cf.Jirecek，Geschichte Ⅰ，231 ff.
[27]Letopis Popa Dukljanina，ed.Sisic，34 f.
[28]This certainly took place after the victory of 1042，but not immediately after Voislav’s return from Byzantine captivity，as Jirecek，Geschichte Ⅰ，231，seems to suppose，and also Istorija naroda Jugoslavije Ⅰ（1953），239.It is clear from the account of the Priest of Dioclea referred to above that Zachlumia was not under the control of Voislav at the time of the Byzantine attack on Zeta in 1042.
[29]Neumann，Weltstellung 64 ff.makes an unsuccessful attempt to whitewash him.
[30]On Psellus cf.P.Bezobrazov，Michail Psell，Moscow 1890;Chr.Zervos，Michel Psellos，Paris 1920;A.Rambaud，‘Michel Psellos’，Etudes sur l’histoire byzantine（1912），111-71;Diehl，Figures Ⅰ，291-317;Neumann，Weltstellung 81-93（the best and most stimulating discussion of Psellus）；E.Renauld，?tudes de la langue et du style de Michel Psellos，Paris 1920;J.Hussey，‘Michael Psellus，the Byzantine Historian’，Speculum 10（1935），81-90 and Church and Learning 73 ff.；B.Tatakis，La philosophie byzantine，Paris 1949，161 ff.；J.Draseke，‘Aus dem Byzanz des Ⅺ.Jahrhunderts’，Neue Jahrb.f.d.klass.Altertum 27（1911），561-76;Ⅴ.Valdenberg，‘Filosofskie vzgljady Michaila Psella’（The philosophical views of Michael Psellus），VS（1945），249-55;P.Joannou，Christliche Metaphysik in Byzanz，Ⅰ.Die Illuminationslehre des Michael Psellos und Joannes Italos，Ettal 1956;cf.also the bibliography in Moravcsik，Byzantinoturcica Ⅰ，2nd ed.，439 ff.On Xiphilinus cf.K.G.Bonis，，Texte und Forsch.zur byz.-neugr.Philol.24（1938）。
[31]Cf.Fuchs，Hohere Schulen 24 ff.；Zervos，Michel Psellos（1920），76 ff.；Hussey，Church and Learning 51 ff.Cf.also J.M.Hussey，‘The Byzantine Empire in the Eleventh Century：Some Different Interpretations’，Transact.of the Royal Hist.Society 32（1950），71 ff.，where the author disagrees with some of my views on the development of the Byzantine Empire in the eleventh century and would pass a more favourable verdict on this period by reason of its achievements in the fields of intellectual and religious life.I would not underestimate such achievements，but here I can only refer very briefly to their effect on the political development of Byzantium;this took is primarily concerned with the Byzantine State and in the political sphere the eleventh century proved to be the fatal turning-point when its decline began. ↑返回顶部↑
[27]Letopis Popa Dukljanina，ed.Sisic，34 f.
[28]This certainly took place after the victory of 1042，but not immediately after Voislav’s return from Byzantine captivity，as Jirecek，Geschichte Ⅰ，231，seems to suppose，and also Istorija naroda Jugoslavije Ⅰ（1953），239.It is clear from the account of the Priest of Dioclea referred to above that Zachlumia was not under the control of Voislav at the time of the Byzantine attack on Zeta in 1042.
[29]Neumann，Weltstellung 64 ff.makes an unsuccessful attempt to whitewash him.
[30]On Psellus cf.P.Bezobrazov，Michail Psell，Moscow 1890;Chr.Zervos，Michel Psellos，Paris 1920;A.Rambaud，‘Michel Psellos’，Etudes sur l’histoire byzantine（1912），111-71;Diehl，Figures Ⅰ，291-317;Neumann，Weltstellung 81-93（the best and most stimulating discussion of Psellus）；E.Renauld，?tudes de la langue et du style de Michel Psellos，Paris 1920;J.Hussey，‘Michael Psellus，the Byzantine Historian’，Speculum 10（1935），81-90 and Church and Learning 73 ff.；B.Tatakis，La philosophie byzantine，Paris 1949，161 ff.；J.Draseke，‘Aus dem Byzanz des Ⅺ.Jahrhunderts’，Neue Jahrb.f.d.klass.Altertum 27（1911），561-76;Ⅴ.Valdenberg，‘Filosofskie vzgljady Michaila Psella’（The philosophical views of Michael Psellus），VS（1945），249-55;P.Joannou，Christliche Metaphysik in Byzanz，Ⅰ.Die Illuminationslehre des Michael Psellos und Joannes Italos，Ettal 1956;cf.also the bibliography in Moravcsik，Byzantinoturcica Ⅰ，2nd ed.，439 ff.On Xiphilinus cf.K.G.Bonis，，Texte und Forsch.zur byz.-neugr.Philol.24（1938）。
[31]Cf.Fuchs，Hohere Schulen 24 ff.；Zervos，Michel Psellos（1920），76 ff.；Hussey，Church and Learning 51 ff.Cf.also J.M.Hussey，‘The Byzantine Empire in the Eleventh Century：Some Different Interpretations’，Transact.of the Royal Hist.Society 32（1950），71 ff.，where the author disagrees with some of my views on the development of the Byzantine Empire in the eleventh century and would pass a more favourable verdict on this period by reason of its achievements in the fields of intellectual and religious life.I would not underestimate such achievements，but here I can only refer very briefly to their effect on the political development of Byzantium;this took is primarily concerned with the Byzantine State and in the political sphere the eleventh century proved to be the fatal turning-point when its decline began. ↑返回顶部↑