第174章（2 / 2）
[113]Nic.Choniates 391 f.
[114]Cf.W.Ohnsorge，‘Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte Manuels Ⅰ.von Byzanz’，Brackmann-Festschrift（1931），371 ff.
[115]Dolger，Reg.1446.
[116]Cf.A.Vasiliev，‘Das genaue Datum der Schlacht von Myriokephalon’，BZ 27（1927），288 ff.
[117]Nic.Choniates 248;cf.also Manuel’s letter to the English king Henry Ⅱ，Roger of Hovedene（ed.W.Stubbs），Ⅱ，102-4（English trans.in A.Vasiliev，‘Manuel Comnenus and Henry Plantagenet’，BZ 29（1929-30），237-40）.P.Wirth，‘Kaiser Manuel Komnenos und die Ostgrenze，Rückeroberung und Wiederaufbau der Festung Dorylaion’，BZ 55（1962），22 ff.，assumes that after the battle of Myriocephalon，Manuel Ⅰ had to under-take to evacuate Dorylaeum.If so，then towards the end of the reign of Manuel the eastern frontier of the Byzantine Empire must have been considerably further west than was previously supposed，and than is shown in our map of the Empire under the Comneni.
[118]Printed in Kap-Herr，Kaiser Manuel 156 f.
[119]On the Patzinaks cf.Cinnamus 8;on the Serbs，Nic.Choniates 23，。
[120]Cinnamus 103.
[121]Cinnamus 120.
[122]Nic.Choniates 273;on this cf.Ostrogorsky，La féodalité28 ff.
[123]Zepos，Jus Ⅰ，381 ff.；Dolger，Reg.1418 and 1419.Nic.Choniates 270 f.and Cinnamus 276 also mention these measures;cf.Charanis，‘Monastic Properties’82 ff.
[124]Dolger，Reg.1333 and 1398.The two decrees are only mentioned in Balsamon（Rhalles-Potles Ⅱ，653）.On the basis of the indictions given Dolger puts the first decree in either September 1143 or 1158 or 1173，and its re-issue in the February of either 1156 or 1170.Obviously 1173 can be eliminated for the first decree，and in all probability this was issued in September 1158，soon after the order of March 1158 forbidding any further increase in monastic property，and the second decree would then fall in February 1170.
[125]Cf.the characteristic formula of immunity in the chrysobull of May 1158 issued to monasteries in Constantinople and its environs，‘Thus my imperial majesty desires that all real estate of the aforementioned monasteries is to be regarded as outside the control and authority of the practors，and as the practors have no right to exact dues or anything else in themes not subordinated to them，similarly the practors of the theme in which the real estate lies shall not be regarded as practors in so far as this real estate is concerned’（Zepos，Jus Ⅰ，384）。 ↑返回顶部↑
[114]Cf.W.Ohnsorge，‘Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte Manuels Ⅰ.von Byzanz’，Brackmann-Festschrift（1931），371 ff.
[115]Dolger，Reg.1446.
[116]Cf.A.Vasiliev，‘Das genaue Datum der Schlacht von Myriokephalon’，BZ 27（1927），288 ff.
[117]Nic.Choniates 248;cf.also Manuel’s letter to the English king Henry Ⅱ，Roger of Hovedene（ed.W.Stubbs），Ⅱ，102-4（English trans.in A.Vasiliev，‘Manuel Comnenus and Henry Plantagenet’，BZ 29（1929-30），237-40）.P.Wirth，‘Kaiser Manuel Komnenos und die Ostgrenze，Rückeroberung und Wiederaufbau der Festung Dorylaion’，BZ 55（1962），22 ff.，assumes that after the battle of Myriocephalon，Manuel Ⅰ had to under-take to evacuate Dorylaeum.If so，then towards the end of the reign of Manuel the eastern frontier of the Byzantine Empire must have been considerably further west than was previously supposed，and than is shown in our map of the Empire under the Comneni.
[118]Printed in Kap-Herr，Kaiser Manuel 156 f.
[119]On the Patzinaks cf.Cinnamus 8;on the Serbs，Nic.Choniates 23，。
[120]Cinnamus 103.
[121]Cinnamus 120.
[122]Nic.Choniates 273;on this cf.Ostrogorsky，La féodalité28 ff.
[123]Zepos，Jus Ⅰ，381 ff.；Dolger，Reg.1418 and 1419.Nic.Choniates 270 f.and Cinnamus 276 also mention these measures;cf.Charanis，‘Monastic Properties’82 ff.
[124]Dolger，Reg.1333 and 1398.The two decrees are only mentioned in Balsamon（Rhalles-Potles Ⅱ，653）.On the basis of the indictions given Dolger puts the first decree in either September 1143 or 1158 or 1173，and its re-issue in the February of either 1156 or 1170.Obviously 1173 can be eliminated for the first decree，and in all probability this was issued in September 1158，soon after the order of March 1158 forbidding any further increase in monastic property，and the second decree would then fall in February 1170.
[125]Cf.the characteristic formula of immunity in the chrysobull of May 1158 issued to monasteries in Constantinople and its environs，‘Thus my imperial majesty desires that all real estate of the aforementioned monasteries is to be regarded as outside the control and authority of the practors，and as the practors have no right to exact dues or anything else in themes not subordinated to them，similarly the practors of the theme in which the real estate lies shall not be regarded as practors in so far as this real estate is concerned’（Zepos，Jus Ⅰ，384）。 ↑返回顶部↑